Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MGRPX
GFAFX vs MGRPX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MGRPX
GFAFX vs MGRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MGRPX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MGRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MGRPX (3.41B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MGRPX: GFAFX (0.20) vs MGRPX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MGRPX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MGRPX (13 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than MGRPX (0.53). MGRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGRPX: GFAFX (250) vs MGRPX (5000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. MGRPX (1.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.04 vs. MGRPX (-32.21).
| GFAFX | MGRPX | GFAFX / MGRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.53 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.53 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.581 | -8.600 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.41B | 10,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 1.13 | 747% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.57 | 89.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.04 | -32.21 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.81 | 67.61 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers