Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MLGRX
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R3
Price$8.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.58B
GFAFX vs MLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MLGRX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MLGRX (13.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than MLGRX: GFAFX (0.29) vs MLGRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MLGRX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MLGRX (19 years). MLGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MLGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). MLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: MLGRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. MLGRX (-2.27). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. MLGRX (-19.36).
| GFAFX | MLGRX | GFAFX / MLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.29 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 11.082 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 13.6B | 2,441% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | -2.27 | -812% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 18.73 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | -19.36 | -218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | -13.28 | -751% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement