Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.18
Change+$0.76 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.77B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.37
Change+$0.16 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MSHOX (5.38M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.18) vs GFAFX (0.32). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. GFAFX (6.55). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. MSHOX (15.97).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.962 | 16.380 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 5.38M | 5,686,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.18 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 11.18 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.81 | 30.79 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | 15.97 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement