Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$13.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MSHOX (5.36M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFAFX (0.28). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. MSHOX (2.36). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. MSHOX (-3.80).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 12.776 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 5.36M | 6,097,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.10 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 2.36 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 20.50 | 306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | -3.80 | -898% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement