Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MSHOX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. MSHOX (4.74M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.28) vs GFAFX (0.35). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (14.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. MSHOX (-0.11). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. MSHOX (10.03).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 14.88 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | 2.785 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 4.74M | 5,990,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.28 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -0.11 | -3,274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 20.44 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 10.03 | 442% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...