Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.74
Change-$0.13 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.59M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.6M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFAFX (0.29). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. MSHOX (13.92). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. MSHOX (11.09).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 20.721 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 5.6M | 6,005,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.10 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 13.92 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.13 | 34.81 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | 11.09 | 443% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement