Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. MSHOX (5.73M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFAFX (0.29). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. MSHOX (13.87). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. MSHOX (11.01).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.089 | 22.604 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 5.73M | 5,956,332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 13.87 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.85 | 39.69 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | 11.01 | 431% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement