Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.65
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.71M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. MSHOX (5.71M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFAFX (0.29). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (25 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. MSHOX (11.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.62 vs. MSHOX (4.94).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.187 | 20.393 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 5.71M | 6,005,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.28 | 11.32 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.40 | 36.17 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.62 | 4.94 | 883% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.47 | N/A | - |