Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.41
Change+$0.41 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.6B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.48M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MSHOX (5.48M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.11) vs GFAFX (0.30). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.93 vs. GFAFX (10.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.87 vs. MSHOX (13.54).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.727 | 18.346 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 5.48M | 5,890,936% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.11 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 11.93 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.92 | 34.46 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.87 | 13.54 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement