Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs MSHOX
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.36
Change+$1.61 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.78
Change+$0.37 (+2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64M
GFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. MSHOX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MSHOX (5.64M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: MSHOX (1.11) vs GFAFX (0.30). GFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFAFX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. MSHOX (12.17). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. MSHOX (9.04).
| GFAFX | MSHOX | GFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 13.89 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.371 | 21.048 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 5.64M | 5,833,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.11 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 12.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 28.12 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.75 | 9.04 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement