Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PABGX
GFAFX vs PABGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PABGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$73.15
Change-$1.50 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.54B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Advisor
Price$173.71
Change-$4.76 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.46B
GFAFX vs PABGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PABGX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PABGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 299B vs. PABGX (62.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PABGX: GFAFX (0.45) vs PABGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PABGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PABGX (25 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PABGX (9.80). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABGX: GFAFX (250) vs PABGX (2500). PABGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.41 vs. GFAFX (9.58). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. PABGX (52.04).
| GFAFX | PABGX | GFAFX / PABGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.207 | -0.867 | -139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299B | 62.5B | 478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 10.41 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.86 | 23.30 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.11 | 52.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.31 | 149.82 | 46% |