Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs PABGX
GFAFX vs PABGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PABGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Advisor
Price$159.79
Change+$2.97 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.89B
GFAFX vs PABGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PABGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PABGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PABGX (53.9B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PABGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs PABGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PABGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs PABGX (25 years). PABGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PABGX (15.70). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABGX: GFAFX (250) vs PABGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. PABGX (-5.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. PABGX (40.27).
| GFAFX | PABGX | GFAFX / PABGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.789 | -12.892 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 53.9B | 484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.32 | -5.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 10.32 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 40.27 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.37 | 118.99 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...