Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PLXGX
GFAFX vs PLXGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PLXGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
Virtus KAR Capital Growth I
Price$23.17
Change-$0.17 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.03M
GFAFX vs PLXGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PLXGX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and PLXGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PLXGX (690M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PLXGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PLXGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PLXGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PLXGX (19 years). PLXGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PLXGX (14.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLXGX: GFAFX (250) vs PLXGX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. PLXGX (1.04). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. PLXGX (-3.23).
| GFAFX | PLXGX | GFAFX / PLXGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 8.659 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 690M | 48,696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 1.04 | 1,717% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.13 | 18.54 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | -3.23 | -1,517% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 66.60 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement