Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs PLXGX
GFAFX vs PLXGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs PLXGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.57
Change-$2.71 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.85B
Virtus KAR Capital Growth I
Price$22.92
Change-$0.69 (-2.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.69M
GFAFX vs PLXGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. PLXGX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and PLXGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PLXGX (678M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than PLXGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs PLXGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than PLXGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs PLXGX (19 years). PLXGX (0.99) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PLXGX (14.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PLXGX: GFAFX (250) vs PLXGX (100000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. PLXGX (-1.38). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.71 vs. PLXGX (-10.60).
| GFAFX | PLXGX | GFAFX / PLXGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.011 | 9.916 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 678M | 48,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | -1.38 | -751% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.60 | 34.76 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.71 | -10.60 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.83 | 67.21 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement