Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QCLGX
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.96
Change+$0.34 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and QCLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. QCLGX (3.96B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QCLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: GFAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. GFAFX (14.72). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.28 vs. QCLGX (26.30).
| GFAFX | QCLGX | GFAFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 15.496 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 3.96B | 8,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 16.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.01 | 74.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 26.30 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.23 | 85.24 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement