Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QCLGX
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.34
Change+$0.65 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.23 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and QCLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. QCLGX (4.07B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs QCLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: GFAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. GFAFX (5.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.45 vs. QCLGX (21.22).
| GFAFX | QCLGX | GFAFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.344 | 11.582 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 4.07B | 7,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 5.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 56.04 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.45 | 21.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.79 | 75.56 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement