Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QCLGX
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QCLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
GFAFX vs QCLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QCLGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and QCLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. QCLGX (3.69B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QCLGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QCLGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QCLGX (20 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: GFAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.65 vs. GFAFX (18.40). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. QCLGX (23.94).
| GFAFX | QCLGX | GFAFX / QCLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.75 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 11.582 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 3.69B | 9,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 19.65 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 58.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 23.94 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 80.13 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement