Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QILGX
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$42.53
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.83B
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QILGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and QILGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. QILGX (3.83B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QILGX (0.01). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFAFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.04 vs. GFAFX (16.70). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. GFAFX (48.30).
| GFAFX | QILGX | GFAFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.099 | 15.541 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 3.83B | 8,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.01 | 4,600% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | 22.04 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.48 | 81.32 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 62.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | 150.06 | 69% |