Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QILGX
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$41.17
Change+$0.12 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.58B
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QILGX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and QILGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. QILGX (3.58B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFAFX (0.30) vs QILGX (0.01). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFAFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. GFAFX (14.13). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.05 vs. GFAFX (37.04).
| GFAFX | QILGX | GFAFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.859 | 11.663 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 3.58B | 9,154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.01 | 4,666% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 18.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.63 | 67.39 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 45.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 141.66 | 68% |