Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QILGX
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.34
Change+$0.65 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$41.50
Change+$0.35 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QILGX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and QILGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. QILGX (4.07B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs QILGX (0.01). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFAFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. GFAFX (5.20). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.35 vs. GFAFX (32.45).
| GFAFX | QILGX | GFAFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.87 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.344 | 12.558 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 4.07B | 7,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.01 | 4,723% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 8.45 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 72.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.45 | 47.35 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.79 | 136.92 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers