Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs QILGX
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs QILGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$43.42
Change+$0.51 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
GFAFX vs QILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. QILGX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and QILGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. QILGX (3.96B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than QILGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs QILGX (0.01). GFAFX was incepted earlier than QILGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs QILGX (20 years). QILGX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: GFAFX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. GFAFX (14.72). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.56 vs. GFAFX (42.28).
| GFAFX | QILGX | GFAFX / QILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 16.382 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 3.96B | 8,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.01 | 4,674% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 18.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.01 | 92.81 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 53.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.23 | 149.97 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement