Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$77.13
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.67M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RBCGX (73.7M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. GFAFX (6.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. RBCGX (7.06).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 14.192 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 73.7M | 443,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 7.48 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 64.95 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 7.06 | 483% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 27.38 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement