Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$79.53
Change-$0.38 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.55M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. RBCGX (77.6M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.91 vs. GFAFX (15.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. RBCGX (12.96).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.967 | 18.508 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 77.6M | 442,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 19.91 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 78.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 12.96 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 36.27 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement