Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$76.98
Change-$0.12 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.93M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RBCGX (75.9M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.29) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.08 vs. GFAFX (18.40). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. RBCGX (11.43).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 14.341 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 75.9M | 437,418% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | 23.08 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | 62.38 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 11.43 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | 32.02 | 312% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement