Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$62.76
Change+$0.41 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.14M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RBCGX (62.1M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.96 vs. GFAFX (-5.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RBCGX (29.01).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.789 | -7.534 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 62.1M | 420,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.32 | 0.96 | -556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 13.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 29.01 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.37 | 2.36 | 2,131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...