Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.12
Change+$0.89 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$70.04
Change+$0.89 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. RBCGX (70.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.45) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (36 years). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 431.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.44 vs. GFAFX (20.75). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.33 vs. RBCGX (28.56).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.540 | 27.559 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 70.2M | 433,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.75 | 27.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.79 | 8.69 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.33 | 28.56 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.91 | -11.38 | -676% |