Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$76.71
Change+$0.55 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.73B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$69.32
Change+$0.52 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. RBCGX (69M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.32) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. GFAFX (9.75). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.47 vs. RBCGX (20.72).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.999 | 2.032 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 69M | 437,681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 11.33 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.34 | 36.86 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.47 | 20.72 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.40 | 12.38 | 577% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement