Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$65.33
Change+$0.41 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.08M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. RBCGX (65.1M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. GFAFX (3.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.32 vs. RBCGX (20.47).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -3.722 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 65.1M | 436,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | 7.29 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 29.74 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 20.47 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 7.20 | 852% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...