Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs RBCGX
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.73
Change-$0.13 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.14B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$74.96
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.22M
GFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. RBCGX (76.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFAFX (0.30) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. GFAFX (13.32). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.23 vs. RBCGX (20.21).
| GFAFX | RBCGX | GFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.01 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.161 | 11.167 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 76.2M | 426,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.32 | 15.73 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.49 | 56.39 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.23 | 20.21 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.78 | 18.93 | 437% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement