Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.88
Change+$0.70 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.37
Change+$0.10 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.97M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. SBHAX (107M). SBHAX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: SBHAX (0.48) vs GFAFX (0.45). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.63 vs. SBHAX (0.55). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.38 vs. SBHAX (20.95).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.586 | 3.789 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 107M | 289,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.48 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 0.55 | 4,110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.38 | -8.46 | -217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.38 | 20.95 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.39 | 84.58 | 101% |