Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$67.15
Change+$1.46 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$17.87
Change+$0.32 (+1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.22M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. SBHAX (85.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs SBHAX (0.23). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.43 vs. SBHAX (-15.86). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.63 vs. SBHAX (14.86).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.941 | -10.138 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 85.2M | 307,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.23 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.43 | -15.86 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.70 | -15.30 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.63 | 14.86 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.42 | 46.65 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...