Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.72
Change+$0.14 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.50
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.15M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SBHAX (92.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: GFAFX (0.30) vs SBHAX (0.21). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. SBHAX (-10.30). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. SBHAX (6.43).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.859 | 4.506 | 330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 92.2M | 355,748% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.21 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | -10.30 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.63 | 0.62 | 8,517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 6.43 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.57 | 73.99 | 131% |