Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SBHAX
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.62
Change-$1.26 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.01B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$17.98
Change-$0.25 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.23M
GFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SBHAX commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SBHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. SBHAX (91.2M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: GFAFX (0.33) vs SBHAX (0.22). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SBHAX (21.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: GFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. SBHAX (-14.97). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.37 vs. SBHAX (28.29).
| GFAFX | SBHAX | GFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.969 | -6.759 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 91.2M | 305,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.22 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -14.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | -11.77 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.37 | 28.29 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.87 | 57.35 | 99% |