Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLCGX
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.94
Change-$0.59 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$33.64
Change-$0.30 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.36M
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SLCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. SLCGX (40.4M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFAFX (0.28) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. SLCGX (-2.30). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. SLCGX (20.91).
| GFAFX | SLCGX | GFAFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.157 | 17.643 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 40.4M | 816,832% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -2.30 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | 53.23 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 20.91 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.41 | 14.86 | 595% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement