Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SLCGX
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$26.22
Change+$2.75 (+11.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.98M
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. SLCGX (29M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFAFX (0.35) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.13 vs. SLCGX (-19.37). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. SLCGX (12.24).
| GFAFX | SLCGX | GFAFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.350 | -18.648 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 29M | 937,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.13 | -19.37 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.17 | -10.15 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | 12.24 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.06 | -15.05 | -260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...