Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLCGX
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.24
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth I
Price$33.29
Change+$0.32 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.46M
GFAFX vs SLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLCGX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SLCGX (39.5M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLCGX: GFAFX (0.30) vs SLCGX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLCGX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SLCGX (31 years). SLCGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLCGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. SLCGX (5.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.88 vs. SLCGX (15.68).
| GFAFX | SLCGX | GFAFX / SLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.564 | 14.281 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 39.5M | 830,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 5.57 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.65 | 39.41 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.88 | 15.68 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.66 | 22.32 | 447% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement