Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.56
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.14M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SLGCX (39.1M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. SLGCX (-42.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.82 vs. SLGCX (-61.74).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.286 | 12.039 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 39.1M | 836,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | -42.13 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.41 | -39.83 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.82 | -61.74 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.50 | -75.53 | -115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement