Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.38
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.04M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SLGCX (40M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.40 vs. SLGCX (-41.89). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.23 vs. SLGCX (-63.31).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.754 | 14.757 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 40M | 830,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.40 | -41.89 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.12 | -39.69 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | -63.31 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.75 | -73.33 | -136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement