Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$6.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.56M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. SLGCX (41.6M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. SLGCX (-43.24). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.40 vs. SLGCX (-61.42).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.089 | 19.029 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 41.6M | 819,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | -43.24 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.85 | -35.68 | -190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.40 | -61.42 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.58 | -72.77 | -148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement