Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$75.18
Change+$0.27 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.33M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. SLGCX (36.3M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SLGCX (26 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. SLGCX (-48.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.46 vs. SLGCX (-62.04).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.925 | 1.359 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297B | 36.3M | 818,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | -48.06 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.59 | -44.88 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.46 | -62.04 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.61 | -77.60 | -86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement