Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SLGCX
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.20
Change+$0.72 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$4.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.01M
GFAFX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SLGCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. SLGCX (33M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs SLGCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SLGCX (26 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. SLGCX (-52.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. SLGCX (-58.66).
| GFAFX | SLGCX | GFAFX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -9.126 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 33M | 833,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | -52.20 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.95 | -59.66 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | -58.66 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.39 | -79.20 | -78% |