Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs SMMSX
GFAFX vs SMMSX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs SMMSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
GFAFX vs SMMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. SMMSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and SMMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. SMMSX (2.85B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than SMMSX: GFAFX (0.35) vs SMMSX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than SMMSX: GFAFX (24 years) vs SMMSX (16 years). SMMSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). SMMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). SMMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: SMMSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. SMMSX (-6.98). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. SMMSX (21.98).
| GFAFX | SMMSX | GFAFX / SMMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.88 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.88 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.789 | -18.594 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 2.85B | 9,151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.32 | -6.98 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 5.06 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 21.98 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.37 | 36.36 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...