Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBCIX
GFAFX vs TBCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.41
Change+$0.42 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth I
Price$202.15
Change+$1.40 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.68B
GFAFX vs TBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBCIX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and TBCIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. TBCIX (64.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBCIX: GFAFX (0.32) vs TBCIX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBCIX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TBCIX (10 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TBCIX (0.57). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TBCIX (15.70). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBCIX: GFAFX (250) vs TBCIX (500000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. TBCIX (7.00). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.32 vs. TBCIX (42.63).
| GFAFX | TBCIX | GFAFX / TBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.57 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.802 | 7.130 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319B | 64.7B | 493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 7.00 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.69 | 69.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.32 | 42.63 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement