Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs TBDAX
GFAFX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$16.35
Change-$0.99 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.54M
GFAFX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. TBDAX (319M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs TBDAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TBDAX (25 years). TBDAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. TBDAX (-7.57). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. TBDAX (52.51).
| GFAFX | TBDAX | GFAFX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.82 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.93 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -7.815 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 319M | 87,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -7.57 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | 16.53 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.15 | 52.51 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.48 | 49.19 | 123% |