Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDAX
GFAFX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$21.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.1M
GFAFX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TBDAX (432M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDAX: GFAFX (0.29) vs TBDAX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDAX (26 years). TBDAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. TBDAX (6.29). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.75 vs. TBDAX (16.84).
| GFAFX | TBDAX | GFAFX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.91 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.693 | 15.843 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 432M | 77,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 6.29 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.88 | 93.52 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.75 | 16.84 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.22 | 92.25 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers