Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.54M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TBDCX (426M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. TBDCX (0.45). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. TBDCX (-3.14).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.90 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 12.947 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 426M | 78,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 0.45 | 3,924% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.13 | 60.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | -3.14 | -1,562% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | 35.86 | 285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement