Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.36
Change+$1.61 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.83
Change+$0.20 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.12M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TBDCX (413M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. TBDCX (-2.58). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. TBDCX (-10.34).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.90 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.371 | 9.284 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 413M | 79,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -2.58 | -564% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 46.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.75 | -10.34 | -404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.19 | 39.00 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement