Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets422.93M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. TBDCX (423M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. TBDCX (-4.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. TBDCX (-9.42).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.81 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.87 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 13.032 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 423M | 77,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | -4.53 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 65.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | -9.42 | -362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 28.34 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement