Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$69.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.85B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$10.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.41M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and TBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 276B vs. TBDCX (317M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.33) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TBDCX (25 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. TBDCX (-11.17). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.30 vs. TBDCX (12.77).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.90 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.304 | -5.196 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276B | 317M | 87,066% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | -11.17 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 23.39 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.30 | 12.77 | 551% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.28 | 10.42 | 579% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...