Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs TBDCX
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$10.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.29M
GFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. TBDCX (299M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs TBDCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs TBDCX (25 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.92 vs. TBDCX (-16.46). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. TBDCX (-5.78).
| GFAFX | TBDCX | GFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.90 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.076 | -13.969 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 299M | 87,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | -16.46 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | 7.10 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | -5.78 | -641% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.66 | -2.13 | -2,236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...