Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs TBDQX
GFAFX vs TBDQX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs TBDQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth R6
Price$21.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.13M
GFAFX vs TBDQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. TBDQX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and TBDQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBDQX (431M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDQX: GFAFX (0.29) vs TBDQX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDQX: GFAFX (25 years) vs TBDQX (8 years). TBDQX (1.09) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). TBDQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). TBDQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: TBDQX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.70 vs. TBDQX (9.71). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.30 vs. TBDQX (27.41).
| GFAFX | TBDQX | GFAFX / TBDQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.44 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.099 | 15.159 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 431M | 78,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | 9.71 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.48 | 83.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 27.41 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | N/A | - |