Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs WLGYX
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$81.18
Change+$0.51 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.85B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$39.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
GFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WLGYX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and WLGYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 318B vs. WLGYX (8.05B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: GFAFX (0.30) vs WLGYX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. WLGYX (8.88). GFAFX (47.89) and WLGYX (45.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | WLGYX | GFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.89 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.99 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.060 | 3.319 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318B | 8.05B | 3,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 8.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 49.41 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.89 | 45.58 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.34 | 98.18 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement