Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs WPSIX
GFAFX vs WPSIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs WPSIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$73.15
Change-$1.50 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.54B
AB Concentrated Growth I
Price$52.15
Change-$0.58 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets774.24M
GFAFX vs WPSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. WPSIX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and WPSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 299B vs. WPSIX (774M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than WPSIX: GFAFX (0.45) vs WPSIX (0.36). GFAFX was incepted earlier than WPSIX: GFAFX (24 years) vs WPSIX (11 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. WPSIX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSIX: GFAFX (250) vs WPSIX (2000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. WPSIX (-5.59). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. WPSIX (30.26).
| GFAFX | WPSIX | GFAFX / WPSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.207 | -0.265 | -456% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299B | 774M | 38,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | -5.59 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.86 | 4.43 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.11 | 30.26 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.31 | 85.79 | 81% |