Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNBX
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.04M
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ZVNBX (147M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFAFX (0.29) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.64 vs. GFAFX (16.70). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.30 vs. ZVNBX (31.76).
| GFAFX | ZVNBX | GFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.099 | 13.508 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 147M | 231,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | 28.64 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.48 | 99.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | 31.76 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | 325.57 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers