Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNBX
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$44.35
Change+$1.00 (+2.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.71M
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVNBX (137M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFAFX (0.29) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.96 vs. GFAFX (14.72). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.28 vs. ZVNBX (15.26).
| GFAFX | ZVNBX | GFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.862 | 14.592 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 137M | 248,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 23.96 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.01 | 123.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.28 | 15.26 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.23 | 340.55 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement