Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNBX
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.24
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.57
Change+$0.55 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.21M
GFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (143M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFAFX (0.30) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFAFX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. GFAFX (15.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.88 vs. ZVNBX (22.79).
| GFAFX | ZVNBX | GFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.52 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.564 | 11.076 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 143M | 229,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 29.29 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.65 | 92.14 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.88 | 22.79 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.66 | 320.20 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement