Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNIX
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$42.16
Change+$0.64 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.3M
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. ZVNIX (126M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: GFAFX (0.28) vs ZVNIX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (15.24). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. ZVNIX (5.70). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. ZVNIX (7.07).
| GFAFX | ZVNIX | GFAFX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.22 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 6.928 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 126M | 259,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 5.70 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 113.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 7.07 | 483% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 303.11 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement