Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNIX
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$44.88
Change+$0.75 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.32M
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and ZVNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. ZVNIX (135M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: GFAFX (0.29) vs ZVNIX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (13.62). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.00 vs. GFAFX (15.06). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. ZVNIX (17.77).
| GFAFX | ZVNIX | GFAFX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.22 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.967 | 13.649 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 135M | 254,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 24.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 122.88 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 17.77 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 348.02 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement