Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ZVNIX
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.24
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$43.78
Change+$0.57 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.21M
GFAFX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and ZVNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNIX (143M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNIX: GFAFX (0.30) vs ZVNIX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFAFX (24 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). ZVNIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (13.62). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFAFX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.68 vs. GFAFX (15.76). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.88 vs. ZVNIX (24.67).
| GFAFX | ZVNIX | GFAFX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.22 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.564 | 11.280 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 143M | 229,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 29.68 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.65 | 93.85 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.88 | 24.67 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.66 | 332.10 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement