Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFCUX vs RWEBX
GFCUX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFCUX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity R6
Price$23.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.84M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.77
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
GFCUX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFCUX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFCUX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GFCUX (379M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GFCUX: RWEBX (0.76) vs GFCUX (0.50). GFCUX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GFCUX (10 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GFCUX (0.88). GFCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFCUX: RWEBX (250) vs GFCUX (5000000). GFCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. RWEBX (3.78). GFCUX return over 5 years is better than : 58.18 vs. RWEBX (40.82).
| GFCUX | RWEBX | GFCUX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.06 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.856 | 8.175 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.76 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 3.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 27.15 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.18 | 40.82 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.16 | 66.81 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement