Ad is loading...
GFCUX vs RWMFX
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GFCUX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enh CorEqFund-ShareClassR6
Price$22.59
Change-$0.42 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.83M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.14
Change-$0.88 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFCUX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFCUX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GFCUX (424M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GFCUX: RWMFX (1.70) vs GFCUX (0.39). GFCUX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GFCUX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GFCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RWMFX (30.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFCUX: RWMFX (250) vs GFCUX (5000000). GFCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.19 vs. RWMFX (8.20). GFCUX return over 5 years is better than : 66.62 vs. RWMFX (38.24).
| GFCUX | RWMFX | GFCUX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.983 | 4.242 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 424M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.70 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.19 | 8.20 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.69 | 18.09 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.62 | 38.24 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...