Ad is loading...
GFCUX vs RWMFX
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GFCUX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enh CorEqFund-ShareClassR6
Price$20.32
Change-$1.08 (-5.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.73M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$59.59
Change-$2.28 (-3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.67B
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFCUX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFCUX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. GFCUX (401M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GFCUX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GFCUX (0.60). GFCUX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GFCUX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GFCUX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GFCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFCUX: RWMFX (250) vs GFCUX (5000000). GFCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. RWMFX (2.19). GFCUX return over 5 years is better than : 109.25 vs. RWMFX (79.80).
| GFCUX | RWMFX | GFCUX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.336 | 0.955 | -454% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 188B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.53 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 2.19 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.77 | 8.51 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.25 | 79.80 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...