Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFCUX vs RWMFX
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GFCUX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity R6
Price$21.99
Change-$0.38 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.87M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$63.00
Change-$1.03 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.11B
GFCUX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFCUX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFCUX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. GFCUX (441M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GFCUX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GFCUX (0.60). GFCUX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GFCUX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GFCUX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GFCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFCUX: RWMFX (250) vs GFCUX (5000000). GFCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. RWMFX (2.18). GFCUX return over 5 years is better than : 82.72 vs. RWMFX (57.84).
| GFCUX | RWMFX | GFCUX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.31 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.31 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 2.799 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 193B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.54 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 2.18 | 408% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.69 | 21.64 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.72 | 57.84 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers