GFF vs MMM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a Buy and MMM is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
| GFF | MMM | GFF / MMM | |
| Capitalization | 3.63B | 58.7B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 270M | -6.76B | -4% |
| Gain YTD | 32.996 | 48.500 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.09 | 10.77 | 493% |
| Revenue | 2.68B | 32.7B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 5.99B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 1.63B | 16.9B | 10% |
GFF | MMM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFF's Valuation (76) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MMM (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMM (70) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's SMR Rating (13) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GFF (16) in the Building Products industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
MMM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as GFF (47) in the Building Products industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MMM (99) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MMM’s over the last 12 months.
| GFF | MMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RWEBX | 64.92 | -0.09 | -0.14% |
| American Funds Washington Mutual R2E | |||
| WFDAX | 29.65 | -0.07 | -0.24% |
| Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A | |||
| WWSMX | 16.97 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
| Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra | |||
| PMFYX | 11.51 | -0.03 | -0.26% |
| Pioneer Multi-Asset Income Y | |||
| TSVAX | 20.26 | -0.13 | -0.64% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val A | |||
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFF | 100% | +18.20% | ||
| MLI - GFF | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| IIIN - GFF | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| CRS - GFF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| WOR - GFF | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| HAYN - GFF | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
MMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMM | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| IIIN - MMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| GFF - MMM | 41% Loosely correlated | +18.20% | ||
| HON - MMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TRC - MMM | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| HAYN - MMM | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||