Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs GGRCX
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.60
Change-$0.59 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and GGRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. GGRCX (172M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs GGRCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs GGRCX (27 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: GFFFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. GGRCX (-8.53). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.14 vs. GGRCX (-31.59).
| GFFFX | GGRCX | GFFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.78 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.07 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.411 | -6.978 | -221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 172M | 191,860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | -8.53 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.76 | 34.61 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.14 | -31.59 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.20 | -57.39 | -157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers