Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs GGRCX
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.32
Change+$0.61 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$17.37
Change+$0.16 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.11M
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and GGRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. GGRCX (193M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs GGRCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: GFFFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. GFFFX (14.61). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.91 vs. GGRCX (-11.87).
| GFFFX | GGRCX | GFFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.78 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.07 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.426 | 17.683 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 193M | 177,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.61 | 18.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.34 | 70.96 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.91 | -11.87 | -378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.36 | -45.17 | -227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement