Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs GGRCX
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$17.20
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.1M
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and GGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. GGRCX (197M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs GGRCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: GFFFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.13 vs. GFFFX (16.03). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.74 vs. GGRCX (-9.28).
| GFFFX | GGRCX | GFFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.78 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.07 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.307 | 16.531 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 197M | 173,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 21.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.79 | 70.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.74 | -9.28 | -525% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.50 | -43.23 | -253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement