Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs GGRCX
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs GGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.46
Change+$0.67 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$16.59
Change+$0.12 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.1M
GFFFX vs GGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. GGRCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and GGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GGRCX (194M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs GGRCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than GGRCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs GGRCX (26 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: GFFFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.93 vs. GFFFX (21.29). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. GGRCX (-13.00).
| GFFFX | GGRCX | GFFFX / GGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.78 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.07 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.936 | 11.585 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 194M | 171,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.29 | 23.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.05 | 50.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.24 | -13.00 | -348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | -46.12 | -220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement