Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.46M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. HSUCX (69.5M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. HSUCX (8.47). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.93 vs. HSUCX (-6.41).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.954 | 3.065 | 651% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 69.5M | 490,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.13 | 8.47 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.80 | 67.12 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.93 | -6.41 | -717% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.92 | -81.88 | -131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement