Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs HSUCX
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.99M
GFFFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. HSUCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and HSUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. HSUCX (63M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs HSUCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: GFFFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. HSUCX (-1.13). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. HSUCX (-13.51).
| GFFFX | HSUCX | GFFFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.15 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | -2.105 | -761% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 63M | 519,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | -1.13 | -638% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 46.12 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | -13.51 | -261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | -17.72 | -515% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement