Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs ILGCX
GFFFX vs ILGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs ILGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr A
Price$23.20
Change+$0.16 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.98M
GFFFX vs ILGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. ILGCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and ILGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ILGCX (217M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than ILGCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs ILGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than ILGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs ILGCX (11 years). ILGCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). ILGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGCX: GFFFX (250) vs ILGCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. ILGCX (9.87). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. ILGCX (8.18).
| GFFFX | ILGCX | GFFFX / ILGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.79 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.18 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.667 | 8.628 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 217M | 152,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | 9.87 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.88 | 28.82 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | 8.18 | 527% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.98 | 47.64 | 222% |