Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs KCGIX
GFFFX vs KCGIX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs KCGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.73
Change+$1.74 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$24.75
Change+$0.53 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.51M
GFFFX vs KCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. KCGIX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and KCGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. KCGIX (266M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: GFFFX (0.49) vs KCGIX (0.03). GFFFX was incepted earlier than KCGIX: GFFFX (17 years) vs KCGIX (11 years). KCGIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: GFFFX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. GFFFX (7.04). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.43 vs. GFFFX (33.04).
| GFFFX | KCGIX | GFFFX / KCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.76 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.76 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.934 | 15.960 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 266M | 122,180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.03 | 1,498% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 14.72 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.13 | 92.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.04 | 46.43 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.00 | 142.76 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement