Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LGRCX
GFFFX vs LGRCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LGRCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.90
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
Loomis Sayles Growth C
Price$23.63
Change+$0.12 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.63B
GFFFX vs LGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LGRCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LGRCX (17.6B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LGRCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs LGRCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LGRCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LGRCX (22 years). LGRCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRCX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: GFFFX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). LGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. GFFFX (16.68). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.68 vs. LGRCX (24.26).
| GFFFX | LGRCX | GFFFX / LGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.66 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.67 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.467 | 8.994 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 17.6B | 1,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.68 | 17.90 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.22 | 50.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.68 | 24.26 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.85 | 158.07 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement