Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$32.73
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.63B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and LSGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LSGRX (17.6B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.49) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (35 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. LSGRX (6.16). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.93 vs. GFFFX (35.29).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 10.724 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 17.6B | 1,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 6.16 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 67.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 41.93 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 182.44 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement