Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.06
Change-$0.79 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$32.61
Change-$0.34 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.67B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LSGRX (17.7B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.52) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (34 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.32 vs. GFFFX (14.76). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.36 vs. GFFFX (37.83).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.682 | 11.468 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 17.7B | 1,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.76 | 21.32 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.85 | 66.50 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.83 | 41.36 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.20 | 219.54 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers