Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs LSGRX
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.06
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$34.44
Change+$0.32 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.55B
GFFFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. LSGRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and LSGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LSGRX (18.5B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: GFFFX (0.50) vs LSGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs LSGRX (34 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: GFFFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.46 vs. GFFFX (15.05). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.93 vs. GFFFX (43.53).
| GFFFX | LSGRX | GFFFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.076 | 16.509 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 18.5B | 1,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 20.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.98 | 89.44 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.53 | 49.93 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.13 | 215.52 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement