Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NBGTX
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NBGTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$32.86
Change+$0.16 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NBGTX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NBGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NBGTX (2.61B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: GFFFX (0.49) vs NBGTX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NBGTX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NBGTX (32 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: NBGTX (0) vs GFFFX (250). NBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. GFFFX (7.18). GFFFX (35.29) and NBGTX (35.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFFFX | NBGTX | GFFFX / NBGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 11.866 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 2.61B | 12,548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | 34,480% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 8.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 55.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 35.22 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 56.43 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement