Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NBGTX
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NBGTX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.63
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr
Price$33.07
Change+$0.14 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
GFFFX vs NBGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NBGTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NBGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NBGTX (2.63B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NBGTX: GFFFX (0.50) vs NBGTX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NBGTX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NBGTX (32 years). NBGTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NBGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). NBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: NBGTX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. NBGTX (9.81). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.00 vs. NBGTX (37.78).
| GFFFX | NBGTX | GFFFX / NBGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.01 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.918 | 12.653 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 2.63B | 12,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | 34,548% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 9.81 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.85 | 61.67 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.00 | 37.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.07 | 60.48 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement