Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCCX
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$44.55
Change+$0.33 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.49M
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and NWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NWCCX (846M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCCX (17 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. NWCCX (-9.61). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. NWCCX (3.37).
| GFFFX | NWCCX | GFFFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.65 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.83 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 9.239 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 846M | 38,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | -9.61 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 30.94 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 3.37 | 1,048% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | -0.11 | -80,751% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement