Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWCCX
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.94
Change-$0.12 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
Price$46.02
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.83M
GFFFX vs NWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWCCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. NWCCX (888M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWCCX: GFFFX (0.50) vs NWCCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWCCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWCCX (16 years). NWCCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). NWCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCCX: GFFFX (250) vs NWCCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. NWCCX (-2.81). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.34 vs. NWCCX (7.23).
| GFFFX | NWCCX | GFFFX / NWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.65 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.83 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.914 | 13.612 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 888M | 38,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | -2.81 | -501% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.77 | 53.04 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.34 | 7.23 | 600% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.47 | 8.96 | 1,189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement