Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs NWZLX
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.06
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$21.98
Change+$0.21 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.61M
GFFFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. NWZLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and NWZLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NWZLX (231M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: GFFFX (0.50) vs NWZLX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: GFFFX (17 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: GFFFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.98 vs. GFFFX (15.05). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.53 vs. NWZLX (36.49).
| GFFFX | NWZLX | GFFFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.27 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.36 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.076 | 17.358 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 231M | 147,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 15.98 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.98 | 83.71 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.53 | 36.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement