Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PBCKX
GFFFX vs PBCKX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PBCKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
Principal Blue Chip Institutional
Price$51.23
Change-$0.32 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.56B
GFFFX vs PBCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PBCKX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PBCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PBCKX (11.6B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than PBCKX: GFFFX (0.51) vs PBCKX (0.02). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PBCKX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PBCKX (13 years). PBCKX (0.70) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PBCKX (14.70). PBCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PBCKX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.17 vs. PBCKX (12.35). PBCKX return over 5 years is better than : 57.62 vs. GFFFX (50.41).
| GFFFX | PBCKX | GFFFX / PBCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.70 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.945 | 11.807 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 11.6B | 2,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.02 | 2,468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.17 | 12.35 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.02 | 70.47 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.41 | 57.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.11 | 231.54 | 45% |