Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOYX
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$149.97
Change+$1.02 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. PNOYX (6.51B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: PNOYX (0.57) vs GFFFX (0.49). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. PNOYX (-0.96). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. PNOYX (21.51).
| GFFFX | PNOYX | GFFFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 8.055 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 6.51B | 5,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | -0.96 | -750% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 37.35 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 21.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 88.45 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement