Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs PNOYX
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$150.23
Change+$0.44 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
GFFFX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. PNOYX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNOYX (6.63B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: PNOYX (0.59) vs GFFFX (0.50). GFFFX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFFFX (17 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). PNOYX (0.62) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: PNOYX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.03 vs. PNOYX (0.96). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.74 vs. PNOYX (29.14).
| GFFFX | PNOYX | GFFFX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.62 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.307 | 8.243 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 6.63B | 5,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 0.96 | 1,664% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.79 | 43.13 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.74 | 29.14 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.50 | 98.83 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement