Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RBCGX
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$77.13
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.67M
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RBCGX (73.7M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFFFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX (7.48) and GFFFX (7.18) have marching annual gain over last year. GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. RBCGX (7.06).
| GFFFX | RBCGX | GFFFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 14.192 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 73.7M | 443,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 7.48 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 64.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 7.06 | 500% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 27.38 | 333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement