Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RBCGX
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.40
Change-$0.57 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$79.53
Change-$0.38 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.55M
GFFFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RBCGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. RBCGX (77.6M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: GFFFX (0.50) vs RBCGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFFFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.91 vs. GFFFX (15.38). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.11 vs. RBCGX (12.96).
| GFFFX | RBCGX | GFFFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.186 | 18.508 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 77.6M | 442,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 19.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.66 | 78.97 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.11 | 12.96 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.60 | 36.27 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement