Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLAX
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.60
Change-$0.59 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.30
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.04M
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. RDLAX (309M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. RDLAX (5.85). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.14 vs. RDLAX (11.11).
| GFFFX | RDLAX | GFFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.17 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.411 | 14.100 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 309M | 106,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | 5.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.76 | 49.82 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.14 | 11.11 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.20 | 30.22 | 298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers