Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLAX
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$84.87
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$11.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.97M
GFFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. RDLAX (300M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GFFFX (0.52) vs RDLAX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. RDLAX (8.10). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. RDLAX (12.71).
| GFFFX | RDLAX | GFFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.06 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.17 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.426 | 10.204 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 300M | 109,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.95 | 8.10 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | 27.06 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.50 | 12.71 | 358% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.99 | 27.79 | 320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers