Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.85
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.81M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RDLCX (296M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.52) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. RDLCX (5.67). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. RDLCX (-3.08).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.92 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.748 | 9.229 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 296M | 110,811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.09 | 5.67 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.50 | 30.14 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | -3.08 | -1,269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.51 | 17.25 | 588% |