Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RDLCX
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.47
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.63M
GFFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and RDLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RDLCX (306M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GFFFX (0.49) vs RDLCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: GFFFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. RDLCX (3.06). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. RDLCX (1.46).
| GFFFX | RDLCX | GFFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.81 | 22% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.92 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.017 | 13.246 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 306M | 106,863% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 3.06 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.61 | 42.10 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.29 | 1.46 | 2,418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.20 | 12.76 | 715% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement