Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RGWCX
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RGWCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
GFFFX vs RGWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RGWCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RGWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RGWCX (366M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RGWCX: GFFFX (0.51) vs RGWCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RGWCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RGWCX (18 years). RGWCX (3.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). RGWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGWCX: GFFFX (250) vs RGWCX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. RGWCX (13.10). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. RGWCX (30.78).
| GFFFX | RGWCX | GFFFX / RGWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.93 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 3.52 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.667 | 10.861 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 366M | 90,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 13.10 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.59 | 70.24 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | 30.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.14 | 50.64 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers