Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RRBGX
GFFFX vs RRBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RRBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R
Price$196.73
Change+$1.00 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.73B
GFFFX vs RRBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RRBGX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RRBGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. RRBGX (69.7B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RRBGX: GFFFX (0.50) vs RRBGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RRBGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RRBGX (23 years). RRBGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RRBGX (15.70). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRBGX: GFFFX (250) vs RRBGX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. RRBGX (12.81). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.93 vs. RRBGX (32.55).
| GFFFX | RRBGX | GFFFX / RRBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.21 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.954 | 16.568 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 69.7B | 489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.13 | 12.81 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.80 | 89.17 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.93 | 32.55 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.92 | 186.28 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement