Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs RRBGX
GFFFX vs RRBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs RRBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$88.10
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R
Price$193.24
Change+$1.84 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.44B
GFFFX vs RRBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. RRBGX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and RRBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. RRBGX (68.4B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than RRBGX: GFFFX (0.51) vs RRBGX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than RRBGX: GFFFX (17 years) vs RRBGX (23 years). RRBGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RRBGX (15.70). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRBGX: GFFFX (250) vs RRBGX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.17 vs. RRBGX (13.49). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.41 vs. RRBGX (35.60).
| GFFFX | RRBGX | GFFFX / RRBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.21 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.21 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.945 | 13.990 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 68.4B | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.17 | 13.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.02 | 68.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.41 | 35.60 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.11 | 178.20 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement