Ad is loading...
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$66.96
Change+$1.06 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
William Blair Growth N
Price$7.51
Change+$0.15 (+2.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.39M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Hold and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. WBGSX (198M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.62) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.02 vs. WBGSX (-31.15). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.49 vs. WBGSX (-14.72).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.26 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.721 | -16.268 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 198M | 131,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.02 | -31.15 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.42 | -28.05 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.49 | -14.72 | -330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.81 | -48.06 | -108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...