Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$82.54
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.23
Change+$0.11 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.18M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. WBGSX (237M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. WBGSX (-17.84). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.71 vs. WBGSX (-11.63).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.285 | 3.754 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320B | 237M | 135,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | -17.84 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.52 | 6.92 | 875% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.71 | -11.63 | -436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.97 | -34.76 | -253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement