Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
William Blair Growth N
Price$9.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.13M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WBGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WBGSX (243M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.51) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (80 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. WBGSX (-11.82). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. WBGSX (-14.96).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 80 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.667 | 8.646 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 243M | 136,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | -11.82 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.59 | 8.89 | 681% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.16 | -14.96 | -289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.14 | -30.09 | -336% |