Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WBGSX
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WBGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$78.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.29B
William Blair Growth N
Price$8.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.18M
GFFFX vs WBGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WBGSX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and WBGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. WBGSX (227M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WBGSX: GFFFX (0.56) vs WBGSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WBGSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WBGSX (79 years). WBGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). WBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBGSX: GFFFX (250) vs WBGSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. WBGSX (-20.38). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.24 vs. WBGSX (-11.21).
| GFFFX | WBGSX | GFFFX / WBGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.20 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 79 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.418 | -0.910 | -705% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 227M | 136,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | -20.38 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.78 | 3.81 | 1,462% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.24 | -11.21 | -466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.36 | -38.18 | -203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement