Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WLGCX
GFFFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.03B
GFFFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WLGCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WLGCX (8.03B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: GFFFX (0.52) vs WLGCX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: GFFFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. WLGCX (8.37). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. WLGCX (11.64).
| GFFFX | WLGCX | GFFFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.64 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.74 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.033 | 6.456 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 8.03B | 4,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.45 | 8.37 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.47 | 30.30 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 11.64 | 329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.43 | 57.19 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement