Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WLGRX
GFFFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$83.51
Change-$0.16 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
GFFFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WLGRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WLGRX (8.12B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: GFFFX (0.52) vs WLGRX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: WLGRX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.95 vs. WLGRX (17.29). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.68 vs. WLGRX (33.04).
| GFFFX | WLGRX | GFFFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.14 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.24 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.593 | 5.948 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 8.12B | 4,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.95 | 17.29 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | 33.14 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.68 | 33.04 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.36 | 82.65 | 103% |