Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs WPCSX
GFFFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$83.86
Change+$0.78 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.16B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.67M
GFFFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. WPCSX (748M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: GFFFX (0.53) vs WPCSX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: GFFFX (17 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: GFFFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. WPCSX (-3.25). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.65 vs. WPCSX (18.75).
| GFFFX | WPCSX | GFFFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.75 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.75 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.065 | 6.223 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 748M | 43,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -3.25 | -407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.00 | 16.96 | 330% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.65 | 18.75 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.52 | 70.28 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement