Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs ZVNBX
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$87.74
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.04M
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ZVNBX (147M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFFFX (0.51) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFFFX (17 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFFFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.64 vs. GFFFX (17.03). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. ZVNBX (31.76).
| GFFFX | ZVNBX | GFFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.30 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.52 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.296 | 13.508 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 147M | 231,293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.03 | 28.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | 99.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.64 | 31.76 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.71 | 325.57 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers