Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFFFX vs ZVNBX
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFFFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.85
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.57
Change+$0.55 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.21M
GFFFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFFFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFFFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (143M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: GFFFX (0.52) vs ZVNBX (0.00). GFFFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFFFX (17 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFFFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. GFFFX (16.09). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. ZVNBX (22.79).
| GFFFX | ZVNBX | GFFFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.30 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.52 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.748 | 11.076 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 143M | 229,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.09 | 29.29 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.50 | 92.14 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 22.79 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.51 | 320.20 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers