GFGSF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
18.17M
WVMDF
Price
$0.97
Change
+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
39.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFGSF vs WVMDF

Header iconGFGSF vs WVMDF Comparison
Open Charts GFGSF vs WVMDFBanner chart's image
GFG Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$163.2K
Capitalization18.17M
West Vault Mining
Price$0.97
Change+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization39.9M
GFGSF vs WVMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WVMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFGSF vs. WVMDF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFGSF is a Hold and WVMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GFGSF: $0.10 vs. WVMDF: $0.97)
Brand notoriety: GFGSF and WVMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFGSF: 292% vs. WVMDF: 95%
Market capitalization -- GFGSF: $18.17M vs. WVMDF: $39.9M
GFGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $18.17M. WVMDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWVMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WVMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WVMDF is a better buy in the long-term than GFGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WVMDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WVMDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WVMDF is a better buy in the short-term than GFGSF.

Price Growth

GFGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.93% price change this week, while WVMDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.46% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WVMDF($39.9M) has a higher market cap than GFGSF($18.2M). WVMDF YTD gains are higher at: 49.231 vs. GFGSF (-24.252). WVMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -878.78K vs. GFGSF (-1.07M). WVMDF has more cash in the bank: 5.7M vs. GFGSF (4.77M). GFGSF (0) and WVMDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GFGSFWVMDFGFGSF / WVMDF
Capitalization18.2M39.9M46%
EBITDA-1.07M-878.78K121%
Gain YTD-24.25249.231-49%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.77M5.7M84%
Total Debt129KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFGSF vs WVMDF: Fundamental Ratings
GFGSF
WVMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5286
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
8493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFGSF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as WVMDF (38). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew similarly to WVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

WVMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (100). This means that WVMDF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFGSF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as WVMDF (93). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew similarly to WVMDF’s over the last 12 months.

WVMDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (64). This means that WVMDF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

WVMDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (100). This means that WVMDF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFGSFWVMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WVMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVRVF0.06N/A
N/A
Novra Technologies Inc
MTMV1.10N/A
N/A
MOTOMOVA INC.
HKUOY15.97N/A
N/A
Hakuhodo Dy Holdings, Inc.
LGSXY1.05N/A
N/A
Light S.A.
FQVLF16.70-0.25
-1.47%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

GFGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFGSF and WVMDF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFGSF and WVMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFGSF
1D Price
Change %
GFGSF100%
-3.80%
WVMDF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
EQMEF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
ANGPY - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
BHLL - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.59%
GBBFF - GFGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WVMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WVMDF and SSRSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WVMDF and SSRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WVMDF
1D Price
Change %
WVMDF100%
+1.05%
SSRSF - WVMDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - WVMDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%
CHPGF - WVMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
XXMMF - WVMDF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRRZF - WVMDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-18.45%
More