GFIOF
Price
$40.85
Change
+$0.36 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
37.61B
SMAGF
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.04 (-4.26%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
108.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFIOF vs SMAGF

Header iconGFIOF vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts GFIOF vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
Gold Fields
Price$40.85
Change+$0.36 (+0.89%)
Volume$210
Capitalization37.61B
Soma Gold
Price$0.90
Change-$0.04 (-4.26%)
Volume$46.94K
Capitalization108.45M
GFIOF vs SMAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFIOF vs. SMAGF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFIOF is a Buy and SMAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GFIOF: $40.85 vs. SMAGF: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: GFIOF and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFIOF: 46% vs. SMAGF: 311%
Market capitalization -- GFIOF: $37.61B vs. SMAGF: $108.45M
GFIOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $37.61B. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $108.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFIOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFIOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the long-term than SMAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFIOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFIOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFIOF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAGF.

Price Growth

GFIOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.94% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6082.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFIOF($37.6B) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($108M). GFIOF has higher P/E ratio than SMAGF: GFIOF (19.55) vs SMAGF (12.69). GFIOF YTD gains are higher at: 203.869 vs. SMAGF (146.559). GFIOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.05B vs. SMAGF (41.1M). GFIOF has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. SMAGF (3.82M). SMAGF has less debt than GFIOF: SMAGF (32.3M) vs GFIOF (2.55B). GFIOF has higher revenues than SMAGF: GFIOF (6.56B) vs SMAGF (98.2M).
GFIOFSMAGFGFIOF / SMAGF
Capitalization37.6B108M34,815%
EBITDA3.05B41.1M7,414%
Gain YTD203.869146.559139%
P/E Ratio19.5512.69154%
Revenue6.56B98.2M6,675%
Total Cash1.07B3.82M27,928%
Total Debt2.55B32.3M7,907%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFIOF vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
GFIOF
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
836
SMR RATING
1..100
3318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFIOF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (69). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (36). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GFIOF (33). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to GFIOF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (38). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GFIOF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (92). This means that GFIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFIOFSMAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFIOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAMXF100.060.53
+0.53%
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
AIOSF6.01N/A
N/A
Atresmedia Corporacion De Medios De Comunicacion SA
CCYY6.50N/A
N/A
CCCB BANCORP INC.
SNZZF0.70N/A
N/A
Senzime AB
BTDPY10.08-0.08
-0.79%
BARRATT REDROW PLC

GFIOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFIOF has been loosely correlated with GFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFIOF jumps, then GFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFIOF
1D Price
Change %
GFIOF100%
N/A
GFI - GFIOF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
GNGXF - GFIOF
26%
Poorly correlated
+35.00%
DC - GFIOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
SMAGF - GFIOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
DTARF - GFIOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
More

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
+1.91%
PAAS - SMAGF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
AEM - SMAGF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
AGI - SMAGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
EGO - SMAGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
SAND - SMAGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
More