GFKRF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.9M
GGLDF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFKRF vs GGLDF

Header iconGFKRF vs GGLDF Comparison
Open Charts GFKRF vs GGLDFBanner chart's image
Opus One Gold
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization2.9M
Getchell Gold
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$244.94K
Capitalization19.24M
GFKRF vs GGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFKRF vs. GGLDF commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFKRF is a Hold and GGLDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GFKRF: $0.01 vs. GGLDF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: GFKRF and GGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFKRF: 100% vs. GGLDF: 312%
Market capitalization -- GFKRF: $2.9M vs. GGLDF: $19.24M
GFKRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.9M. GGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $19.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFKRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFKRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GFKRF and GGLDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GFKRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.73% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLDF($19.2M) has a higher market cap than GFKRF($2.9M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 115.385 vs. GFKRF (0.000). GFKRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.42M vs. GGLDF (-6.98M). GGLDF has more cash in the bank: 841K vs. GFKRF (75.2K). GFKRF has less debt than GGLDF: GFKRF (0) vs GGLDF (90K). GFKRF (0) and GGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GFKRFGGLDFGFKRF / GGLDF
Capitalization2.9M19.2M15%
EBITDA-1.42M-6.98M20%
Gain YTD0.000115.385-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash75.2K841K9%
Total Debt090K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFKRF vs GGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
GFKRF
GGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFKRF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (87). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GFKRF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GFKRF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFKRF (72). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFKRF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GFKRF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GFKRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFKRFGGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UGRO0.380.06
+18.28%
urban-gro
KALV15.560.17
+1.10%
KalVista Pharmaceuticals
JOE49.620.16
+0.32%
St Joe Company
CMT16.74-0.11
-0.65%
Core Molding Technologies
VST188.23-4.78
-2.48%
Vistra Corp

GFKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFKRF and GFGSF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFKRF and GFGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFKRF
1D Price
Change %
GFKRF100%
N/A
GFGSF - GFKRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
GAYMF - GFKRF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FYMNF - GFKRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - GFKRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - GFKRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.38%
More

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+6.38%
CALRF - GGLDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GAU - GGLDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+10.37%
THM - GGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
PAAS - GGLDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.91%
KGC - GGLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
More