GGAMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.03 (-37.50%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
SOUN
Price
$20.84
Change
+$1.45 (+7.48%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GGAMF vs SOUN

Header iconGGAMF vs SOUN Comparison
Open Charts GGAMF vs SOUNBanner chart's image
Good Gamer Entertainment
Price$0.04
Change-$0.03 (-37.50%)
Volume$1.02K
CapitalizationN/A
SoundHound AI
Price$20.84
Change+$1.45 (+7.48%)
Volume$490.16K
CapitalizationN/A
GGAMF vs SOUN Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGAMF vs. SOUN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGAMF is a Hold and SOUN is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GGAMF: $0.05 vs. SOUN: $19.39)
Brand notoriety: GGAMF and SOUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGAMF: 100% vs. SOUN: 162%
Market capitalization -- GGAMF: $2.89M vs. SOUN: $1.72B
GGAMF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.89M. SOUN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGAMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGAMF is a better buy in the long-term than SOUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOUN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOUN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GGAMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOUN (@Packaged Software) price change was +36.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOUN is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOUN($1.72B) has a higher market cap than GGAMF($2.89M). SOUN YTD gains are higher at: 814.623 vs. GGAMF (161.628). GGAMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.31M vs. SOUN (-61.79M). SOUN has more cash in the bank: 95.3M vs. GGAMF (757K). GGAMF has less debt than SOUN: GGAMF (5K) vs SOUN (90.2M). SOUN has higher revenues than GGAMF: SOUN (45.9M) vs GGAMF (932).
GGAMFSOUNGGAMF / SOUN
Capitalization2.89M1.72B0%
EBITDA-17.31M-61.79M28%
Gain YTD161.628814.62320%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue93245.9M0%
Total Cash757K95.3M1%
Total Debt5K90.2M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGAMFSOUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SOUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGAPX30.43N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA Global Growth I
PAGYX22.49-0.10
-0.44%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr Y
ITGRX38.53-0.19
-0.49%
Delaware Ivy Global Growth Fund Class R6
SBEMX9.75-0.06
-0.61%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Instl
JRARX83.88-0.55
-0.65%
Janus Henderson Research R

GGAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAMF has been loosely correlated with VENZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGAMF jumps, then VENZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAMF
1D Price
Change %
GGAMF100%
N/A
VENZF - GGAMF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QIFTF - GGAMF
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
PEGA - GGAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
NTCT - GGAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
SOUN - GGAMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More

SOUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOUN has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOUN jumps, then AI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOUN
1D Price
Change %
SOUN100%
-1.52%
AI - SOUN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
PEGA - SOUN
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
APP - SOUN
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
APPN - SOUN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
QIFTF - SOUN
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
More