Ad is loading...
GGAZF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WGLIF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GGAZF vs WGLIF

Header iconGGAZF vs WGLIF Comparison
Open Charts GGAZF vs WGLIFBanner chart's image
Goldgroup Mining
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Westward Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$173.17K
CapitalizationN/A
GGAZF vs WGLIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGAZF vs. WGLIF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGAZF is a Hold and WGLIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GGAZF: $0.06 vs. WGLIF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: GGAZF and WGLIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGAZF: 5% vs. WGLIF: 213%
Market capitalization -- GGAZF: $3.38M vs. WGLIF: $6.55M
GGAZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.38M. WGLIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGAZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWGLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGAZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WGLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGAZF is a better buy in the long-term than WGLIF.

Price Growth

GGAZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.25% price change this week, while WGLIF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGLIF($6.55M) has a higher market cap than GGAZF($3.38M). GGAZF YTD gains are higher at: 184.534 vs. WGLIF (-30.917). GGAZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -847K vs. WGLIF (-1.31M). GGAZF has more cash in the bank: 1.65M vs. WGLIF (571K). GGAZF (0) and WGLIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGAZFWGLIFGGAZF / WGLIF
Capitalization3.38M6.55M52%
EBITDA-847K-1.31M65%
Gain YTD184.534-30.917-597%
P/E Ratio13.55N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.65M571K289%
Total Debt1.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGAZF: Fundamental Ratings
GGAZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGZZX16.22-0.04
-0.25%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Insgt R6
FTIEX11.70-0.07
-0.59%
Fidelity Total International Equity
VMGIX101.15-0.94
-0.92%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
MSFLX36.28-0.35
-0.96%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise L
FLMIX10.84-0.15
-1.36%
Meeder Muirfield Institutional

GGAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGAZF and MXTLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGAZF and MXTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAZF
1D Price
Change %
GGAZF100%
N/A
MXTLF - GGAZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - GGAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRCF - GGAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WGLIF - GGAZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CYNXF - GGAZF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WGLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WGLIF and FNLPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WGLIF and FNLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGLIF
1D Price
Change %
WGLIF100%
-1.83%
FNLPF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
IMPUY - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
LMGDF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
ORAAF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
GGAZF - WGLIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More