Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$14.90
Change-$0.17 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.58M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. GGCPX (902M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.83) vs GGCPX (1.83). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (7 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.69 vs. VFWPX (14.18). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 86.50 vs. VFWPX (46.26).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.920 | 16.889 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 902M | 65.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 2.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.69 | 14.18 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.41 | 36.62 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.50 | 46.26 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers