Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$15.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.67M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.15
Change-$0.32 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. GGCPX (957M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.68) vs GGCPX (1.73). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (7 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.95 vs. VFWPX (18.21). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 80.42 vs. VFWPX (43.78).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.587 | 24.339 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 957M | 71.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.68 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.95 | 18.21 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.34 | 49.42 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.42 | 43.78 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement