Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$16.24
Change-$0.17 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.88M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.58
Change-$1.33 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. GGCPX (940M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.74) vs GGCPX (1.66). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (7 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.14 vs. VFWPX (17.09). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 82.04 vs. VFWPX (45.81).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.850 | 27.387 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 940M | 74.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.74 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.14 | 17.09 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.18 | 65.77 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.04 | 45.81 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement